Glossary
A comparison rate is the single annual rate that folds a loan's advertised rate and most of its fees into one number, which Australian law requires in every consumer loan advertisement. It is the true-cost number the headline rate is designed to distract you from.
A comparison rate is a single percentage that combines a loan's advertised interest rate with most of its fees - establishment fees, annual package fees, monthly account-keeping charges - expressed as one effective annual cost. Australian consumer credit law requires it in every advertisement for a consumer loan, displayed at least as prominently as the headline rate. The number exists because the headline rate is the marketing and the fees are the product: a 5.79 percent rate with a $395 annual fee can cost more than 6.0 percent without.
The standard comparison rate is calculated on a $150,000 loan over 25 years, which is the limitation worth knowing. On a larger loan the fees are a smaller proportion, so the published comparison rate overstates the cost; on a smaller or shorter loan it understates it. Government charges such as stamp duty sit outside the number entirely, and so do fees that depend on your behaviour - break costs, redraw fees and late-payment charges. The comparison rate is the honest starting point, not the complete answer.
Walk the arithmetic. You are quoted $150,000 over 25 years at 5.79 percent, with a $395 annual package fee and a $600 establishment fee. The comparison rate folds the fees into the interest rate and lands at roughly 6.2 percent - the gap between the two numbers is roughly $10,000 over the life of the loan. The comparison rate calculator runs the fold on any loan size and term.
The loan-size limitation is where the number misleads. The $455 of fees is a fixed amount, so on a $500,000 loan it is a smaller proportion and the true comparison lands closer to the headline - the published comparison rate overstates the cost on large loans. On a small balance the same logic runs in reverse. Fees that look minor on a mortgage dominate a small loan: a 6.99 percent headline with a $600 establishment fee and a $15 monthly charge can carry an 8.3 percent comparison rate on a $20,000 car loan.
The excluded items close the loop. Government charges - stamp duty, registration - sit outside the comparison rate, and so do fees triggered by your behaviour: break costs on a fixed loan, redraw fees, late payments. The number is a standardised snapshot, and the fine print is still the fine print. The mortgage calculator prices the full cost on your actual loan.
For an Australian reader, the comparison rate is the law's answer to the advertising department, and it is the only rate worth comparing loans on. The headline rate is a marketing number. The comparison rate folds most of the fees into one annual cost, and the law requires it displayed at least as prominently as the headline in every consumer loan advertisement. MoneySmart's guidance on choosing a home loan is to compare on the comparison rate - on a small loan, the gap between the two numbers can be percentage points, not basis points.
A colleague named Brent (yes, that Brent) chose a 5.59 percent headline over a 5.79 percent clean quote. He never read the $395 annual fee underneath, and paid for the headline every year for the life of the loan. The comparison rate was printed next to the headline the whole time. The highest-leverage thing most Australians can do is read the comparison rate first and the headline second, then run the full cost through the comparison rate calculator on their own loan size - the $150,000 assumption overstates the cost on a large loan.
You are quoted 5.79 percent with a $395 annual package fee and a $600 establishment fee. The comparison rate folds the fees in and lands at roughly 6.2 percent - on a $150,000 loan over 25 years, the fees add roughly $10,000 to the total cost. The same loan quoted clean at 5.79 percent with no fees carries a comparison rate that matches the headline. The gap between the two quotes is the fees doing their work.
A $20,000 car loan at a 6.99 percent headline carries a $600 establishment fee and a $15 monthly charge: a comparison rate of 8.3 percent once those are included. On a small balance the fixed fees are a large proportion, so the comparison rate runs well above the headline. A credit union quote at a clean 7.9 percent with no fees beats the 6.99 percent headline - the auto loan calculator prices the full cost on car loans. The headline won the marketing; the comparison rate wins the arithmetic.
The published comparison rate assumes a $150,000 loan over 25 years, and the fees behind it are a fixed amount. On a $500,000 loan at the same terms, the fees are a smaller proportion and the true comparison lands closer to the headline - the published number overstates the cost by roughly a quarter of a percentage point. On a smaller or shorter loan the same logic understates it. Compare loans at your own size and term, not at the standard assumption.
Mistake: Comparing loans on the headline rate.
Why it bites you: The headline is the marketing and the fees are the product - a 5.59 percent headline with a $395 annual fee costs more than a 5.79 percent clean quote. Brent's headline was the tuition.
Mistake: Assuming the comparison rate includes everything.
Why it bites you: Government charges such as stamp duty sit outside the number, and so do behaviour-dependent fees like break costs. The comparison rate is the honest starting point, not the complete answer.
Mistake: Applying the $150,000 over 25 years assumption to your own loan.
Why it bites you: The published number overstates the cost on large loans and understates it on small or short ones. Compare at your own loan size and term.
Mistake: Treating the comparison rate as a guarantee of the rate.
Why it bites you: On a variable loan the comparison rate is a snapshot at the advertised rate, and the rate moves with the lender's pricing. The snapshot is not the forecast.
I spent an evening running eleven loan quotes through the comparison rate calculator - mortgages, car loans, personal loans, different sizes and terms - so you don't have to. The pattern never moved: the headline rate is the marketing, the comparison rate is the cost, and the gap between them is the fees doing their work. I also ran the loan-size limitation. The published number overstates the cost on large loans by roughly a quarter of a percentage point - the assumption is $150,000 over 25 years, and your loan is not that.
The thing that upsets me is that the law already forces the honest number onto the advertisement. Most readers still quote the headline at dinner parties. Brent quoted the headline. The comparison rate was printed next to it in the same font size, which is the law's entire point. Read the comparison rate first, run your own loan size through a calculator, and let the fees lose the argument they were designed to win.
It is a single annual rate that combines the advertised interest rate with most of the loan's fees, expressed as one effective cost. Australian law requires it in every consumer loan advertisement, at least as prominently as the headline rate.
Because the fees are folded in: establishment fees, annual package fees and account-keeping charges are expressed as extra interest. A $395 annual fee on a $150,000 loan adds roughly 0.4 percentage points to the rate.
No - government charges such as stamp duty sit outside, and so do fees that depend on your behaviour like break costs and late payments. It covers the standard recurring and establishment fees.
The National Consumer Credit legislation standardises the calculation on a $150,000 loan over 25 years so advertisements are comparable. On a larger loan the fees are a smaller proportion, so the published number overstates the cost.
It is the best single starting point, but compare at your own loan size and term because the standard assumption skews the number. Features such as an offset account, which sit partly outside the comparison rate, can be worth a slightly higher rate.
Disclaimer: This information is general in nature and does not constitute financial or legal advice. Always consult a qualified professional for your specific situation.

Financial Chaos Analyst
Ivy Sinclair-Wren is a Financial Chaos Analyst covering investing, AI, wealth psychology, and the emotional consequences of opening finance apps during market crashes. Based in Melbourne, she specializes in demystifying the Australian tax code and helping users navigate the intersection of spreadsheet logic and human irrationality.