Glossary

    Glossary

    Managed Fund

    A managed fund pools your money with other investors into a portfolio run by a professional, bought unlisted from the fund itself. It is the product index funds compete with - usually on price, usually successfully.

    MarketsLast reviewed 2026-10-02

    What it is

    A managed fund is a pool of money from many investors, run by a professional manager. You buy it directly from the fund company rather than on a market. You apply, and your money buys units at the unit price calculated at the end of that day. You redeem the same way: an application or redemption form, not a trading screen. There is no exchange price, no intraday market and no brokerage - the pricing happens once a day, at the fund's net asset value.

    The structure is the Australian default for professionally managed money, and the fees are the reason it is under pressure from index funds. Active managed funds charge roughly 0.8 to 1.5 percent a year, plus entry or exit fees on some products. MoneySmart's guidance treats the fee schedule as the first thing to read. The liquidity is the second catch: redemptions take days, not seconds, and the price you get is the next unit price after the fund processes the form.

    Key takeaways

    • A managed fund pools investors' money into a professionally run portfolio, bought unlisted from the fund.
    • Units are priced once a day at the net asset value - no exchange, no intraday price.
    • Active managed funds charge roughly 0.8 to 1.5 percent a year, plus entry or exit fees on some.
    • Redemptions take days, not seconds: the price is the next unit price after processing.
    • Compare managed funds on fees and performance after fees, not the headline return.

    How it works

    The mechanics run on the unit price. You apply with $10,000; the fund calculates the unit price at the end of the day - say $2.50 - and your money buys 4,000 units. The manager invests the pooled money across the portfolio, and the unit price moves daily with the value of the holdings. Every investor's units are priced identically; the pool is the product, and the unit is your slice of it.

    The liquidity is the second mechanism, and the one the application form glosses over. Redemption is a form, not a sale: the fund processes it, and you receive the next calculated unit price - typically within a handful of business days. If the market falls 3 percent in that window, the redemption absorbs the fall: $50,000 redeemed into a 3 percent drop is roughly $1,500 less than the balance on the day the form was lodged. The liquidity entry covers the spectrum from T+2 to glacial.

    The fees are the third mechanism. An active managed fund charging a 1.2 percent MER on a $50,000 holding takes $600 a year, deducted from the unit price before the performance is reported - and a 2 percent entry fee takes $1,000 off the top on the way in. The management expense ratio entry covers the drag, and the comparison that matters is after fees: the index fund alternative charges 0.04 to 0.15 percent for the same market exposure.

    Why it matters

    For an Australian reader, the managed fund is the product behind most "professional management" conversations, and the fee schedule is the first thing to read. MoneySmart's guidance on managed funds is blunt: check the fees, check whether performance is reported after fees, and understand that redemption takes days. The index fund and ETF alternative offers the same market exposure for a fraction of the fee, which is why the active version needs a reason.

    A colleague named Brent (yes, that Brent) redeemed $50,000 from a managed fund to fund a renovation. He lodged the form on a Tuesday, and the fund processed it on the following Monday. The market fell 3 percent in the window, the redemption landed at roughly $1,500 less than the balance he calculated, and the renovation budget absorbed the difference. The highest-leverage thing most Australians can do is read the fee schedule and the redemption terms before applying. The index fund entry covers the alternative that trades in seconds.

    Real-world examples

    $10,000 into a fund at a $2.50 unit price

    The fund calculates the unit price at the end of the day: $2.50. The $10,000 application buys 4,000 units, and the manager invests the pooled money across the portfolio. The unit price moves daily with the holdings' value, and every investor's units are priced identically. A 2 percent entry fee would have taken $200 off the top - 80 units - before a cent was invested. The fee schedule is the first thing to read, because the entry fee is the part the brochure omits.

    The redemption that fell 3 percent in processing

    The form was lodged on a Tuesday with a $50,000 balance; the fund processed it the following Monday. The market fell 3 percent in the window, and the redemption landed at roughly $48,500 - the next unit price after processing, not the balance on the day of the form. The liquidity entry covers the spectrum, and the renovation budget absorbed the $1,500. An ETF would have sold within seconds at a known price.

    The fee comparison: 1.2 percent versus 0.04 percent

    The active managed fund charges a 1.2 percent MER plus a 2 percent entry fee: $1,000 to enter, $600 a year on a $50,000 holding. The index ETF alternative charges 0.04 percent - $20 a year - with a one-way brokerage of roughly $10. The active version needs to outperform by more than a percentage point a year to justify itself, and the SPIVA scorecards say roughly nine in ten do not over fifteen years. The index fund entry covers the passive side of the comparison.

    Common mistakes

    Mistake: Paying entry fees without checking.

    Why it bites you: A 2 percent entry fee takes $1,000 off a $50,000 application before a cent is invested. Some funds waive it; the brochure does not always say which.

    Mistake: Assuming daily pricing means instant liquidity.

    Why it bites you: The price is calculated once a day and redemptions take business days: a 3 percent market fall in the window costs $1,500 on $50,000. Brent's renovation absorbed the gap.

    Mistake: Comparing performance before fees.

    Why it bites you: The reported return is the after-fee number, so the fee is already inside it - but the drag compounds in ways the annual figure hides. Compare on fees and tracking, not the brochure's best year.

    Mistake: Ignoring the exit in the fine print.

    Why it bites you: Exit fees, redemption windows and suspension clauses live in the product disclosure statement. A fund that can gate redemptions is a different liquidity proposition than the application form implies.

    Ivy's take

    I spent an evening reading three managed fund product disclosure statements end to end - fee schedules, redemption terms, suspension clauses - so you don't have to. The unit pricing is exactly as advertised: once a day, at the net asset value, with the fee deducted before the performance is reported. The redemption terms are the part the application form glosses over, and the business-days-not-seconds detail cost Brent $1,500 on one form.

    The index fund alternative offers the same market exposure for a fraction of the fee, and the SPIVA scorecards keep scoring the active version's management. I have stopped treating "professionally managed" as a feature; it is a cost centre with a marketing budget. Read the fee schedule, check the redemption window, and let the fund earn its fee against the index before paying it - the scorecards say it usually does not.

    Related jargon, defined

    Unit price
    The daily price of one unit, calculated at the fund's net asset value.
    Net asset value
    The total value of the fund's holdings divided by units on issue.
    Entry fee
    The upfront charge on application - up to a few percent on some funds.
    Redemption
    Selling units back to the fund - a form, not a trade, processed in business days.
    MER
    The fund's annual cost, deducted from returns before performance is reported.
    Index fund
    The passive alternative charging a fraction of the fee for the same exposure.

    Frequently asked questions

    What is a managed fund?+

    It is a pool of money from many investors, run by a professional manager and bought directly from the fund company rather than on an exchange. Units are priced once a day at the net asset value, and redemption is a form, not a trade.

    How is a managed fund different from an ETF?+

    A managed fund is unlisted and priced once a day; an ETF trades on the ASX through the day at a market price. Managed funds charge more on average, take days to redeem, and charge no brokerage; ETFs charge brokerage but price continuously.

    What fees do managed funds charge in Australia?+

    Typically 0.8 to 1.5 percent a year for active management, plus entry or exit fees on some products, with the MER deducted from returns before performance is reported. The fee schedule in the product disclosure statement is the first thing to read.

    How long does it take to get money out of a managed fund?+

    Usually a handful of business days after the redemption form is processed, and you receive the next calculated unit price rather than the balance on the day you lodged. A market fall in the window is absorbed by the redemption.

    Are managed funds worth the fees?+

    The SPIVA scorecards show roughly nine in ten Australian large-cap active funds underperform their index over fifteen years after fees. The index fund alternative offers the same market exposure for 0.04 to 0.15 percent, so the active version needs a reason.

    Disclaimer: This information is general in nature and does not constitute financial or legal advice. Always consult a qualified professional for your specific situation.

    Keep learning

    Ivy Sinclair-Wren

    Ivy Sinclair-Wren

    Financial Chaos Analyst

    Connect on LinkedIn

    Ivy Sinclair-Wren is a Financial Chaos Analyst covering investing, AI, wealth psychology, and the emotional consequences of opening finance apps during market crashes. Based in Melbourne, she specializes in demystifying the Australian tax code and helping users navigate the intersection of spreadsheet logic and human irrationality.