Calculator
Future Value
$379,494.23
Growth Analysis
Each $6,000.00 annual deposit compounds at 7% per year for 25 years. Your $150,000 in contributions grows into $379,494.23 — the final 2.53× of money invested, with $229,494.23 (60%) arriving as compounded growth rather than deposits. The later contributions barely compound while the earliest ones double repeatedly, which is why time in the market beats the size of each deposit.
*Projections assume a constant return and constant contributions with no taxes or fees. Real market returns vary year to year. Educational only, not financial advice.
An annuity in this context is not an insurance product — it is simply a series of equal contributions made at regular intervals. The future value of that annuity answers the question at the heart of every retirement plan: if I invest the same amount every month or every year for a fixed stretch, how large will the pile be at the end? It totals up every deposit plus all the compounded growth each one earns from the day it lands until the horizon ends. The result almost always surprises first-time users, because the ending balance ends up well above the sum of the deposits. For Australian investors this is exactly the math behind a salary sacrifice arrangement, a regular ETF auto-invest plan, or any automatic monthly transfer into a brokerage account. The dollar-cost-averaging habit that most advisers recommend is, mechanically, an annuity — a steady stream of identical investments. Knowing its future value turns an abstract 'save consistently' lecture into a concrete number: five hundred dollars a month at 8% for thirty years is roughly $475,000, of which only $180,000 ever came out of your own pocket. This tool computes that ending balance, splits it into contributions versus compounded growth, and shows the multiplier effect — so you can see precisely why starting earlier and automating the contribution matters more than increasing the deposit later.
Each contribution earns interest from the moment it is invested until the horizon ends, so the first deposit compounds for the full journey and the last deposit barely compounds at all. The future value sums that geometric series in closed form: payment times one plus r raised to the power of n, minus one, all divided by r, where r is the periodic rate and n is the number of payments. If the return is zero the formula collapses to something trivial — deposits times count — and the ending balance equals exactly what you put in. When contributions are monthly, the annual return is split into twelve monthly rates and the number of payments is years times twelve, so twelve smaller deposits per year slightly outpace one annual deposit at the same nominal rate because each dollar starts compounding sooner. The multiplier — future value divided by total contributions — is the headline intuition number: a figure of 3.5× means every dollar you invested turned into three dollars and fifty cents by the end. The difference between the balance and the deposits is pure compounded growth. Two levers move that growth share almost entirely: the number of periods, which controls how many doubling cycles the early deposits enjoy, and the rate, which controls how fast each cycle runs. Extend either and the growth portion of the balance balloons relative to what you contributed.
For a 30-year plan at 7–8%, compounded growth typically makes up 80% or more of the final balance — your deposits are the seed, but time is the harvest. If a projection shows growth making up less than half the ending balance, the horizon is probably too short or the return assumption too low to do much compounding. Before trusting any retirement projection, glance at that split first, because it tells you whether the plan relies on your wallet or on the market clock.
The long-run ASX average sits near 9% before inflation with dividends reinvested, but balanced portfolios land a couple of points lower, and any single investor can be several points off the index. Run the same plan at one point below and one point above your chosen rate to see the spread — on a 30-year horizon, two percentage points roughly doubles or halves the growth portion. If the answer changes your decision, your plan is fragile to the assumption and deserves a more conservative base case.
Twelve equal monthly deposits beat one identical annual deposit at the same quoted rate, because each monthly dollar begins compounding up to eleven months earlier. The gap is small — a few percentage points over decades — but it is free: it costs nothing to set up the monthly automatic transfer that most brokers and super funds already support. Use the frequency toggle in this tool to confirm the edge for your own numbers instead of assuming the two schedules are equal.
If you know the nest egg you need — say $1,000,000 at retirement — run the calculator with a realistic return and horizon, then adjust the contribution until the future value meets the target. That reverse-engineered deposit number is the actionable output: it converts a distant goal into a payroll deduction you can set up this week, and it shows how much the target drops if you start five years earlier instead of raising the amount.
The formula assumes every contribution actually happens — skipped months are pure lost compounding that no later catch-up fully repairs. Set the contribution as an automatic transfer on payday (or a standing salary sacrifice arrangement) so the annuity is a fact, not an intention. Then worry about the rate, the account type, and the fund choice; the habit is what keeps the series unbroken.
A quoted 9% average return is not what lands in your pocket. Subtract fund management fees, brokerage costs, and one to two points for tax if the account is a personally held taxable portfolio, or simply run the projection at a real (after-inflation) rate of 5–6% to see purchasing-power progress instead of nominal dollars. Inside super the tax drag is far smaller, so the nominal rate is closer to what actually compounds. The calculator is only as honest as the rate you feed it.
Dana began salary sacrificing $500 a month into super at 25, assuming a conservative 7%. The calculator showed roughly $1,312,000 at 65 — while $240,000 came from her pay and over $1,072,000 arrived as compounded growth. Seeing that 82% of the ending balance was free money from compounding is what convinced her to keep the habit through two market downturns without pause.
Kevin, 35, wondered whether doubling his contribution at 40 beat the five years he had already skipped. Running both scenarios at 7%, the version that started earlier with the smaller deposit finished ahead of the late-starting larger one. The multiplier on the early deposits was simply too high to replicate with bigger late payments, so he set up an auto-escalation at the smaller amount instead of waiting to earn more.
Priya was deciding between an annual January lump transfer and twelve monthly auto-investments of the same total into her ETF portfolio. Modelling both at 8% over 25 years, the monthly schedule finished several thousand dollars richer because each instalment began compounding sooner. The face totals looked identical, but the timing edge was real — she switched to monthly and stopped debating it.
Everything you need to know about this topic.

Financial Chaos Analyst
Ivy Sinclair-Wren is a Financial Chaos Analyst covering investing, AI, wealth psychology, and the emotional consequences of opening finance apps during market crashes. Based in Melbourne, she specializes in demystifying the Australian tax code and helping users navigate the intersection of spreadsheet logic and human irrationality.