Calculator
Minimum Annual Pension Payment
$37,500
Pension Drawdown Analysis
At age 73, the government's minimum pension drawdown factors require you to pay yourself at least 5% of your $750,000 balance - a minimum of $37,500 per year, or about $1,442.31 each fortnight. The minimum is a floor, not a target: you can draw more whenever your cash flow needs it, and every payment from a taxed fund at 60 or over is tax-free. Under 60, pension payments are simply taxed at your marginal rate less a 15% offset on the taxable element.
*Uses the Australian Government's standard minimum annual payment factors for account-based pensions, applied to your balance at 1 July each year (or at pension commencement). The temporary 50% reduction that applied during 2020-2023 has ended. You may always withdraw more than the minimum; only the floor is modelled here.
Once you convert superannuation into an account-based pension - the structure most Australians use to draw retirement income - the law requires you to pay yourself a minimum amount every financial year. The minimum is a percentage of your pension account balance at the previous 1 July, rising as you age: four percent under 65, five percent from 65, six percent from 75, seven percent from 80, nine percent from 85, eleven percent from 90 and fourteen percent from 95. The percentages were temporarily halved through the pandemic years so retirees were not forced to sell depressed assets, but that relief has ended and the standard factors apply again. Why does a compulsory minimum exist? Account-based pensions receive generous tax treatment - zero tax on fund earnings in pension phase and generally tax-free payments after 60 - so parliament requires the money to actually be spent on retirement rather than hoarded as a tax-privileged estate. For most retirees the minimum is comfortably less than they would draw anyway, making it a planning floor rather than a constraint. But the factors matter enormously for careful planners: drawing exactly the minimum preserves capital and Age Pension entitlements, while the escalating schedule eventually pushes large balances into faster depletion late in life. This calculator shows the minimum payment your balance requires at any age, converted to monthly and fortnightly amounts, so you can plan cash flow, tax position and Centrelink interactions around the number.
The calculation itself is deliberately simple: multiply your pension account balance by the percentage factor matching your age on 1 July of the financial year, or by your age when the pension first commenced if that falls later in the year. A $600,000 balance at age 65 requires a $30,000 minimum payment across the year; at 86 the same logic applies nine percent to whatever balance remains. The critical input is therefore the balance measured at the previous 1 July - not today's fluctuating value - which means strong markets raise next year's compulsory minimum even if your spending needs are unchanged. How you pay yourself matters too. Payments can be taken monthly, quarterly, fortnightly or as lump sums, but the total across the financial year must clear the minimum, and pro-rata rules apply in a part-year. Missing the minimum removes the pension-phase tax exemption on the fund's earnings for that year - an expensive administrative slip rather than a mere fine. Two further wrinkles: the minimum is calculated per pension account, so members running several income streams must satisfy each one separately, and payments reduce your Transfer Balance Cap headroom calculations only in the sense that the capital has left the cap permanently - once drawn, the money cannot be re-contributed to pension phase except within separate contribution caps.
Retirees who draw exactly the minimum regardless of need often accumulate wealth they never enjoy, while those who ignore it entirely risk depleting capital early. The professional approach works backwards: estimate genuine annual spending needs, compare them against this calculator's minimum, and design withdrawals around the gap. If spending sits below the minimum - common among affluent retirees with paid-off homes - decide deliberately where the surplus goes, because reinvesting pension payments in taxable accounts quietly rebuilds a second, fully-taxed estate alongside your concessionally-treated super.
The jump from seven to nine percent at 85, then eleven and fourteen percent beyond, means large balances face rapidly compounding compulsory withdrawals precisely when aged-care decisions loom. A retiree holding $1.2 million at 85 must draw $108,000 whether needed or not. Planners who anticipate this often accelerate modest extra drawings earlier - funding travel and home upgrades in their seventies - or progressively move capital toward the Age Pension assets test strategy, rather than discovering at 88 that government factors are spending their portfolio faster than their own budget would.
Pension payments interact with two other systems simultaneously. First, account-based pension withdrawals are largely ignored by Centrelink's income test after Age Pension age, but the assets test still counts the remaining balance - drawing down faster can genuinely increase entitlements. Second, under-60 retirees pay marginal tax on the taxable element of payments less a 15% offset, so spreading payments across financial years near the tax-free threshold saves real money. Run both checks before locking in your payment frequency each July.
Because the minimum recalculates from your 1 July balance, set an annual reminder to run this calculator with the new figure, confirm your current payment frequency still clears it, and adjust before the year runs away. Members who set-and-forget monthly transfers sized years ago routinely discover mid-year that their balance grew enough to lift the requirement above what they are paying.
Once the minimum is known, choose a rhythm that fits your life: monthly payments mirror household bill cycles, while some retirees prefer quarterly instalments that earn longer inside the fund between draws. There is no tax difference - only behavioural convenience. Whatever you choose, ensure the annual total exceeds the minimum with a small buffer so timing quirks never leave you short.
Compare the calculator's minimum against your actual annual spending plan. If the minimum exceeds your needs, accept it consciously and redirect the surplus - perhaps to an offset account, a term deposit ladder or guilt-free lifestyle spending. If your needs exceed the minimum, remember you can always draw more: the factors are a floor, never a ceiling, and over-restraint in your sixties often just funds inheritances you could enjoy giving differently.
Robert retired at 65 with a $620,000 super balance rolled into an account-based pension. Unsure how much he was allowed to live on, he assumed he must preserve everything until forced otherwise. The calculator showed a minimum of $31,000 - far below his planned $52,000 lifestyle - reframing the pension as permission to spend confidently. He set monthly draws of $4,350, comfortably clearing the floor, and stopped treating his retirement fund as untouchable.
Helen's balance grew strongly through her late seventies, but her standing monthly payment - set years earlier at $1,800 - no longer matched the six percent required at 78. A July review revealed she was drawing under the minimum, risking loss of the fund's tax-free earnings exemption. She topped up with a single catch-up payment before 30 June, restored compliance, and moved to an auto-adjusting monthly amount reviewed each new financial year.
At 83, Denis O'Brien held $950,000 and drew the minimum seven percent. Knowing the factor jumps to nine percent at 85 - then keeps climbing - the family ran projections showing compulsory withdrawals exceeding their spending within three years. They chose to fund a long-planned caravan and home renovation at 83-84, gently accelerating drawdown on their own terms, and redirected later excess payments toward grandchildren's education funds rather than letting the schedule dictate everything.
Everything you need to know about this topic.

Financial Chaos Analyst
Ivy Sinclair-Wren is a Financial Chaos Analyst covering investing, AI, wealth psychology, and the emotional consequences of opening finance apps during market crashes. Based in Melbourne, she specializes in demystifying the Australian tax code and helping users navigate the intersection of spreadsheet logic and human irrationality.