Calculator
A pre-defined target converts exit judgment into a plan: the calculator prints the exact dollar gain, its percentage on the position and on the account, and the dollars per $1,000 invested — the numbers to compare against your stop before entering.
Total Profit at Target
$2,200.00
Target Analysis
At the target, you bank $22.00 per share on 100 shares — $2,200.00 total — a 4.40% lift to your $50,000 account. That is a 14.7% gain on a $15,000 position, worth $146.67 per $1,000 deployed. Pre-defining this number is what turns a feeling of 'up enough' into an executable exit.
*Assumes the target order executes at the target price; real fills can slip through fast markets or overnight gaps. CGT may apply on realised gains - see our CGT calculator. Educational only, not investment advice.
A take profit is the mirror image of a stop loss: a pre-committed price at which a winning trade converts back into cash. Defining it before entry matters for the same reason defining risk does — it forces the reward side of the trade into an explicit number while judgement is still clear, and it removes the open-ended temptation to hold winners until they stop being winners. Traders who never set targets tend to manage profits by mood, which usually means selling the moment relief arrives and riding the remainder down. For Australian investors the discipline applies well beyond active trading. A resources explorer bought for a drill result deserves a written exit; a small-cap holding that doubles on takeover speculation needs a decision framework rather than hope. This calculator prices any target in concrete terms: the dollar gain per share and in total, the gain as a percentage of the position and of the whole portfolio, the exit value landing in your account after the trade, and the profit earned per thousand dollars deployed. It handles long positions taking profit above entry and short positions covering below entry, so the same arithmetic governs both directions. The output turns 'I think it can run' into a number you either accept or adjust — and once accepted, it becomes the order you place at the same time as the entry.
Per-share gain is target minus entry for a long position and entry minus target for a short. Total gain multiplies that distance by the share count; the exit value adds it back to the position's starting worth. Two ratios give the numbers context. The gain expressed against the entry price shows how far the stock must travel — a 15% target demands a very different setup than a 150% one, and the distance itself feeds directly into expectancy math when paired with the stop distance. The gain expressed against total portfolio value shows what the win actually does to your account: a $4,000 profit is life-changing on a $40,000 account and rounding error on a $4 million one. The profit-per-$1,000-deployed readout normalises efficiency across differently sized trades, making it easy to compare where each unit of capital earns most. One asymmetry deserves attention: unlike a stopped loss, an unrealised target costs nothing if missed except opportunity — but pairing every target with a stop produces the reward-to-risk ratio that decides whether a trading approach survives its losing streaks. A 22-point target against an 8-point stop is a 2.75-to-one structure; three losers out of every four still break even. The target is not just a goal, it is half of the ratio that defines the system.
Round numbers feel like targets but rarely are. The useful target sits at the next structural obstacle — prior resistance, a measured move objective, a valuation ceiling, or the level where the original thesis will have been fully paid. Targets placed just past obvious levels are where other orders cluster and fills go to die; targets placed at genuine inflection points are where the market actually changes its mind. Choose the level first, then let the share count make the reward worthwhile.
The target only means something relative to the stop. Before entering, divide target distance by stop distance: anything under two-to-one demands a win rate few retail traders sustain, while structures above three-to-one forgive frequent being wrong. This single habit filters more bad trades than any indicator. When the natural target sits too close to justify the required stop, the correct answer is to skip the trade — the market will offer better geometry another day.
Professional practice rarely exits a full position at one price. Selling thirds — one tranche at the initial target to bank the win and de-risk, one at an extended objective, one left running with a trailing stop — captures both the psychological victory of realising profit and the tail outcome when the trend keeps going. The maths barely suffers: banking a third at two-to-one while the rest runs still beats closing everything at the first wobble. Decide the scaling plan before entry, not during the adrenaline of a gap.
Enter a position only when you can state the stop and the target in writing — the pair defines the trade's reward-to-risk ratio and its maximum regret. If either number embarrasses you ('the target is 60% away because I need it to be'), the sizing is compensating for weak geometry. Adjust the trade until both numbers pass the straight-face test, or wait for one that does.
On ASX holdings approaching twelve months, the profit you keep depends on timing: gains on parcels held over a year receive the 50% CGT discount, so a target reached at month eleven might be worth materially more banked a few weeks later. Where the trade allows, let the calendar finish alongside the chart. Run the after-tax figure through a CGT calculator before treating the headline gain as spendable.
When price reaches your target early — faster than the thesis predicted — treat it as information. Either the market confirmed your work ahead of schedule, or something speculative is inflating the move. Review why the price arrived before mechanically selling: if the fundamental story strengthened, extending the target is legitimate; if the move ran on speculation alone, take the gift. The pre-set number disciplines the decision; it need not robotically end it.
Ethan bought 10,000 shares of a lithium hopeful at $1.20 with a written target of $1.65 and a stop at $1.05 — a four-to-one structure. Six weeks later the sector ran and his target filled on a Tuesday morning, banking $4,500. His previous habit would have held for $3.00, watched the spike fade to $1.30, and sold in disgust. Banking at the plan converted volatility into income; the next three trades included two stops, yet his quarter finished positive for the first time.
Nadia shorted an over-extended retailer at $92, expecting a round trip to fair value near $78. Pricing the cover showed an $11,200 gain on 800 shares — nearly 4% of her account from one position — and clarified how much she could afford to lose if the stock squeezed: her stop sat $4 above entry, capping damage at $3,200. When results disappointed and the slide came, she covered exactly on plan, untouched by the temptation to squeeze out another point.
Marcus set a $172 target on an industrial at $150 based on its old earnings outlook. The company upgraded guidance mid-quarter, and the price walked through $170 in days. Because he had promised himself to re-check the thesis at the target, he recognised the upgrade had moved fair value upward, extended his objective to $195 with the original stop unchanged, and captured the second leg. The discipline was not rigidity — it was having a defined decision point instead of improvising while emotional.
Everything you need to know about this topic.

Financial Chaos Analyst
Ivy Sinclair-Wren is a Financial Chaos Analyst covering investing, AI, wealth psychology, and the emotional consequences of opening finance apps during market crashes. Based in Melbourne, she specializes in demystifying the Australian tax code and helping users navigate the intersection of spreadsheet logic and human irrationality.