Glossary
The Age Pension is a fortnightly payment from Services Australia for Australians 67 and over, means-tested against your income and your assets. It is the safety net under your super - and the means tests are the reason your home, your drawdown rate and your asset mix all interact.
The Age Pension is a fortnightly payment from Services Australia for people who have reached Age Pension age - 67. You must also meet the residency rules: generally ten years in Australia, with at least five without a break. Eligibility and the amount are means-tested twice over - an income test and an assets test - and the test that produces the lower pension is the one that applies. Your main home is generally exempt from the assets test, which is why the family home sits at the centre of every retirement plan.
The maximum basic rate is $1,135.40 a fortnight for singles - roughly $29,520 a year. Couples receive $1,711.80 combined, roughly $44,507 a year, before supplements. The pension supplement and energy supplement can add to those figures, and the rates index every 20 March and 20 September. The pension is the safety net under your super, not a replacement for it: living on the full basic rate alone means budgeting on roughly $568 a week.
Walk both tests. The assets test counts financial assets, investment properties, cars, caravans and business assets - the main home is generally exempt - and above the threshold the pension tapers by roughly $3 a fortnight for every $1,000 of assets. The income test counts employment income, income streams, annuities and investments, with deemed rates applied to financial assets: a set assumed return regardless of what the account actually pays. Services Australia runs both tests, and the lower pension from the two is the one you receive.
The deeming arithmetic is where the tests quietly bite. Financial assets above the deeming threshold are assumed to earn roughly 0.25 percent on the first tranche and 2.25 percent above it - whether the account actually pays 4.5 percent or nothing. An account-based pension balance counts in both tests as well, which is why the drawdown rate interacts with the pension: a higher drawdown raises the income test count while reducing the assets test figure. The two tests pull in opposite directions, and the lower result is the one that applies.
The taper arithmetic is the second bite. Each $1,000 of assets above the threshold costs roughly $78 a year of pension - $100,000 of extra assets costs roughly $7,800 a year. Run your own position through the age pension calculator to see which test bites first.
For an Australian reader, the Age Pension is the floor under every retirement plan. The means tests are why the floor is not automatic. Roughly $29,500 a year for a single is the full basic rate - most retirees receive a part pension, and the part you receive depends on how your super, your assets and your drawdown rate interact with both tests. MoneySmart's guidance points at the interaction directly: your home is generally exempt from the assets test, your account-based pension counts in both, and the deeming rates apply whether your accounts actually earn them.
A colleague named Brent (yes, that Brent) spent his super down hard before 67 because the pension would cover the rest. Then he discovered what the full basic rate actually buys: roughly $568 a week, with the taper meaning every dollar of assets he kept would have paid for itself in pension. The highest-leverage thing most Australians can do is model the means tests before the drawdown strategy. Run them through the age pension calculator and the retirement income calculator - the interaction is where the pension is won or lost.
The couple both reach 67 with combined assets of $200,000 and joint income of $45,000 a year. Their assets are modest enough to pass the assets test in full, but the joint income exceeds the income test limit, so they receive a part pension rather than the full rate. The lower result from the two tests is the one that applies - which is why the income test, not the assets test, bit first. Employment income, income streams and investments all count in the test.
You are a single homeowner at 67 with financial assets above the assets test threshold. Each $1,000 of extra assets above the threshold cuts the pension by roughly $3 a fortnight - $100,000 of extra assets costs roughly $7,800 a year of pension. The taper is why the pension interacts with every drawdown and gifting decision: money spent or gifted below the threshold converts assets into pension at the taper rate. The home is generally exempt, which is why the taper applies to everything except it.
You hold $250,000 in financial assets at 67, and Services Australia deems the balance to earn a set rate - roughly 0.25 percent on the first tranche and 2.25 percent above it - regardless of what the account actually pays. A savings account paying 4.5 percent earns more than the deemed figure, but the pension test counts the deemed income anyway. The deeming rates are the means test assumption, not your account performance. Check the current deeming rates before modelling, because they move.
Mistake: Spending super to nothing before 67 because the pension will cover it.
Why it bites you: The full basic rate is roughly $568 a week for a single - the floor, not a lifestyle. Brent's drawdown strategy priced the pension as a replacement instead of a floor.
Mistake: Gifting large sums without realising the assets test still counts them.
Why it bites you: Gifts beyond $10,000 a year - capped at $30,000 over five years - still count in the assets test for five years. The gift is assessable while the pension tapers.
Mistake: Checking the assets test and ignoring the income test.
Why it bites you: The lower result from the two tests applies, and a $45,000 joint income cuts the pension even with modest assets. Lorenzo and Sophia's part pension was the income test at work.
Mistake: Forgetting an account-based pension counts in both tests.
Why it bites you: Services Australia includes the pension balance in the income and assets tests. The drawdown rate shapes the pension through both, and the lower result applies.
I spent an evening with Services Australia's income and assets test tables and the deeming rates so you don't have to. The pension is the retirement system's most misunderstood component: it is a means-tested floor, not an entitlement earned by breathing. I ran the taper arithmetic through five balance scenarios and the pattern held. Every $1,000 of assets above the threshold costs roughly $78 a year of pension, which is a return the assets themselves would struggle to beat safely.
The framing I use is one line: the pension is the floor, the means tests price the floor, and your super is the part you control. Brent priced the pension as a replacement and spent the balance into it. Model the tests before the drawdown strategy. Let the taper arithmetic - not a newspaper headline - decide how the last decade of your super is spent.
The maximum basic rate is $1,135.40 a fortnight for singles and $1,711.80 combined for couples, before supplements. Rates index every 20 March and 20 September, and most recipients receive a part pension under the means tests.
It is 67, and you must also meet the residency rules - generally ten years in Australia with five without a break. Super access runs years earlier, from 60 if you are retired or leave a job.
Your main home is generally exempt from the assets test while you live in it. Selling it, or moving the proceeds into financial assets, can affect the pension through the assets and income tests.
Yes - Services Australia includes the pension account in both the income and assets tests. The drawdown rate and the balance both shape what Age Pension you receive.
Yes, within limits - the income test reduces the pension as work income rises. The Work Bonus scheme lets you earn more from work without reducing the pension, which is the sanctioned way to combine both.
Disclaimer: This information is general in nature and does not constitute financial or legal advice. Always consult a qualified professional for your specific situation.

Financial Chaos Analyst
Ivy Sinclair-Wren is a Financial Chaos Analyst covering investing, AI, wealth psychology, and the emotional consequences of opening finance apps during market crashes. Based in Melbourne, she specializes in demystifying the Australian tax code and helping users navigate the intersection of spreadsheet logic and human irrationality.