Glossary

    Glossary

    Account-Based Pension

    An account-based pension turns your super into a flexible retirement income stream: you choose how much to draw above the legislated minimums, earnings are tax-free, and the account lasts until it runs out. It does not guarantee income for life - that is what an annuity is for.

    SuperannuationLast reviewed 2026-10-01

    What it is

    An account-based pension is the retirement-phase product your super transfers into when you stop working. The fund also calls it an allocated pension or a retirement income account. You choose how much to draw above the legislated minimum, how often you are paid, how the money is invested, and whether to take lump sums along the way. Investment earnings on the pension account are generally tax-free, and payments from age 60 are generally tax-free too.

    The minimum drawdown scales with age. It is 4 percent of the account balance each 1 July under 65, 5 percent at 65 to 74, 6 percent at 75 to 79, and 7 percent at 80 to 84. From 85 it climbs: 9 percent, then 11 percent at 90 to 94, and 14 percent from 95. There is no maximum, but what you move into pension phase is capped by the transfer balance cap - a $1.9 million general cap, indexed in $100,000 increments. Once started, you generally cannot add money to the account.

    Key takeaways

    • An account-based pension pays a flexible income from your super in the retirement phase.
    • Minimum drawdowns start at 4 percent of the balance and scale up to 14 percent by age 95.
    • Investment earnings on the pension account are generally tax-free.
    • Payments from age 60 are generally tax-free from a taxed fund.
    • It lasts until the balance runs out - it does not guarantee income for life.

    How it works

    Walk one year. You transfer $600,000 from accumulation into pension phase at 62 and choose monthly payments of $2,000 - $24,000 a year, above the 4 percent minimum of the 1 July balance. The fund invests the remaining balance in your chosen option, credits the earnings tax-free, and the next 1 July recalculates the minimum on the new balance. You can take lump sums at any time, and you can change the income amount whenever you like, as long as it stays above the minimum. The compound-interest entry covers what the earnings do over decades.

    The tax layer is the reason the product is popular. From 60, payments from a taxed fund are tax-free, and the earnings inside the pension account are not taxed at all - a 15 percent saving on the accumulation phase for every dollar of return. What you move into pension phase is capped by the transfer balance cap: $1.9 million general cap, indexed. The balance above the cap stays in accumulation, where earnings are taxed at 15 percent.

    The structural weakness is longevity. The account pays until it runs out: drawing more than the earnings, particularly early, depletes the balance, and a bad market in the first years compounds the damage because you are withdrawing from a shrinking base. An annuity is the guaranteed-income counterpart - less flexible, but it cannot run out. Run the trade-off through the minimum pension drawdown calculator and the pension vs lump sum calculator.

    Why it matters

    For an Australian reader, the account-based pension is what the super balance becomes on the day work stops. It is the product that turns four decades of compulsory deposits into a pay packet. MoneySmart's guidance is clear about both sides: flexible payments, tax-free earnings and lump-sum access on one side, no guaranteed returns and no guarantee it lasts on the other. Services Australia also counts the pension account in both the income and assets tests for the Age Pension - the drawdown rate interacts with the pension you may receive.

    A colleague named Brent (yes, that Brent) retired at 61 and drew 8 percent a year through a rising market. The minimum felt too small, and then a drawdown arrived and the withdrawals ate a shrinking balance - sequence risk, paid in full. The highest-leverage thing most Australians can do is draw modestly above the minimum early and keep the earnings compounding. Run the whole picture through the retirement income calculator and check the minimums with the minimum pension drawdown calculator before choosing the drawdown rate.

    Real-world examples

    $600,000 at 62 drawing the 4 percent minimum

    You transfer $600,000 into pension phase at 62 and draw the minimum: 4 percent of the 1 July balance, or $24,000 a year. At 6.5 percent earnings the balance still grows - $639,000 less the $24,000 drawn leaves roughly $615,000 at the end of year one, and the minimum recalculates on the new figure. Drawing the minimum keeps the earnings compounding, which is why the account can outlast the pessimistic projections. The tax bill on the payments is zero from 60 on a taxed fund.

    The over-draw case at 8 percent

    The same $600,000 drawn at 8 percent - $48,000 a year - behaves differently the moment a bad market arrives. Year one falls 15 percent: the balance drops to $510,000, the $48,000 withdrawal leaves $462,000, and the following year's recovery runs on the smaller base. Three years of that pattern leave the balance near $420,000 despite a market that ended roughly flat, because the withdrawals came from the shrinking half. The drawdown rate is the variable that decides whether the account survives a bad sequence.

    The reversionary pension

    You nominate your spouse as a reversionary beneficiary, and the fund continues the pension payments to them when you die - the income stream does not stop at the estate. A spouse or dependant can also choose to take the remaining balance as a lump sum instead, and a child beneficiary's payments continue until 25 before the remainder pays out. The nomination is made with the fund in advance, and the balance at death still sits under the transfer balance cap rules. It is the difference between an income continuing and a balance being inherited.

    Common mistakes

    Mistake: Drawing more than the minimum early because markets are rising.

    Why it bites you: The extra withdrawals come out of the compounding base, and a later drawdown eats a shrinking balance. Brent's 8 percent drawdown was the tuition.

    Mistake: Assuming the pension guarantees income for life.

    Why it bites you: It runs out - that is what an annuity is for. The account lasts as long as the balance, the earnings and the drawdown rate allow.

    Mistake: Moving more than the transfer balance cap into pension phase.

    Why it bites you: The excess is taxed under the excess transfer balance tax rules. The cap is $1.9 million indexed, and the ATO tracks it per person.

    Mistake: Forgetting you cannot add money to a started pension.

    Why it bites you: New contributions sit in accumulation, and a windfall needs a new pension or an accumulation account. The restriction surprises members at their next contribution.

    Ivy's take

    I spent an evening running the drawdown arithmetic through the minimum pension drawdown calculator at five rates so you don't have to. The pattern never moved: the minimum keeps the earnings compounding, and everything above it spends the base. I also ran the bad-sequence case - a 15 percent fall in year one. The 8 percent drawdown left the balance roughly $30,000 lower than the 4 percent drawdown over three years, on the same balance and the same market.

    The framing I use is one line: an account-based pension is a pay packet you fund yourself, and the drawdown rate is the only dial. Brent dialed it up in the good years and paid for it in the bad ones. Draw modestly, let the earnings compound, and treat the annuity option as the insurance policy it is.

    Related jargon, defined

    Transfer balance cap
    The cap on what moves into pension phase - $1.9 million general cap, indexed.
    Minimum drawdown
    The legislated annual minimum - 4 percent of the balance under 65, scaling to 14 percent.
    Accumulation phase
    Where contributions sit and earnings are taxed at 15 percent, before the pension phase.
    Reversionary beneficiary
    The nominee whose pension payments continue after your death.
    Condition of release
    The age and retirement combination that unlocks super for the pension.
    Sequence risk
    The damage bad early markets do to a balance you are withdrawing from.

    Frequently asked questions

    What is the minimum I have to withdraw from an account-based pension?+

    The minimum is a percentage of your account balance each 1 July: 4 percent under 65, 5 percent at 65 to 74, 6 percent at 75 to 79 and 7 percent at 80 to 84. It climbs to 14 percent from age 95.

    Do I pay tax on account-based pension payments?+

    Generally not, if you are 60 or over and the fund is a taxed fund. Between 55 and 59 the taxable component is taxed at your marginal rate, less a 15 percent offset.

    Can I add more money to an account-based pension once it has started?+

    Generally no. New contributions sit in your accumulation account, and moving more into pension phase means starting a new account-based pension - subject to the transfer balance cap.

    How long will my account-based pension last?+

    As long as the balance, the earnings, the drawdown rate and the fees allow. Drawing at or near the minimum with reasonable earnings can make the balance last decades; drawing hard in a falling market can halve its life.

    Does an account-based pension affect the Age Pension?+

    Yes - Services Australia includes the pension account in both the income and assets tests. The drawdown rate and the balance both shape what Age Pension you may receive.

    Disclaimer: This information is general in nature and does not constitute financial or legal advice. Always consult a qualified professional for your specific situation.

    Keep learning

    Ivy Sinclair-Wren

    Ivy Sinclair-Wren

    Financial Chaos Analyst

    Connect on LinkedIn

    Ivy Sinclair-Wren is a Financial Chaos Analyst covering investing, AI, wealth psychology, and the emotional consequences of opening finance apps during market crashes. Based in Melbourne, she specializes in demystifying the Australian tax code and helping users navigate the intersection of spreadsheet logic and human irrationality.