Glossary

    Glossary

    Listed Investment Company

    A listed investment company is a closed-ended fund that trades on the ASX with a fixed number of shares. The manager invests a portfolio; the price you pay is whatever the market decides the portfolio is worth.

    MarketsLast reviewed 2026-10-02

    What it is

    A listed investment company - an LIC - is a company whose business is a share portfolio. You buy its shares on the ASX the way you buy any company's shares, and the fixed number of shares means the manager never sells assets to return your money: you sell the shares to another investor instead. Most LICs are actively managed, and the large ones - Australian Foundation Investment Company, Argo, Milton - have run the same dividend-paying portfolios for decades.

    The structure creates the pricing quirk: the share price is set by supply and demand, not by the portfolio's value. The net tangible assets - the NTA - are the per-share value of what the company owns, and LICs routinely trade at a discount or premium to it. A 10 percent discount means $1.10 of assets per dollar spent; the same discount can widen, which is the risk the discount never advertises. The closed structure also means the manager can ignore redemptions in a panic and hold the portfolio through a drawdown.

    Key takeaways

    • An LIC is a closed-ended listed company with a fixed number of shares, not an open fund.
    • You sell shares to another investor; the manager never sells assets for your redemption.
    • The share price trades at a premium or discount to the NTA - the portfolio's per-share value.
    • Most LICs are actively managed; the large ones charge roughly 0.1 to 0.2 percent, smaller ones 1 percent-plus.
    • The closed structure lets the manager hold the portfolio through a drawdown without forced selling.

    How it works

    Walk the structure. The company holds a portfolio of shares - mostly ASX blue chips for the big LICs - funded by the fixed share count issued at listing or in later placements. Dividends the portfolio receives flow to the company, and the company pays its own franked dividends to shareholders, supported by the company tax it has paid. There is no unit pricing and no daily creation or redemption: the shares simply trade on the ASX at whatever price buyers and sellers agree.

    The NTA is the anchor. The company publishes the audited net tangible assets per share - say $1.00 - and the market price might be $0.88, a 12 percent discount. Buying at the discount delivers roughly $1.14 of assets per dollar spent, and the discount is the historical source of LIC returns beyond the portfolio itself. The same arithmetic runs in reverse: pay $1.12 for $1.00 of assets and the premium is a headwind that only closes if the discount comes back.

    The fee arithmetic decides the long run the same way it does for any fund. The large LICs charge management fees of roughly 0.1 to 0.2 percent - a fraction of the 1.2 percent active funds charge - and the management expense ratio entry covers the compounding. Smaller LICs charge 1 percent-plus for strategies that statistically struggle to beat the index after fees, which is the arithmetic the index fund entry covers from the passive side. The fee is disclosed in the annual report, not the advertisement.

    Why it matters

    For an Australian reader, the LIC is the local institution that predates the ETF by decades - the dividend-focused portfolios that dominated ASX investing before index funds existed. The structure matters more than the manager: a closed fund trades at a price the market sets, which is both the discount opportunity and the premium trap. The exchange-traded fund entry covers the open-ended alternative, and the managed fund entry covers the unlisted cousin. ASIC MoneySmart guidance treats LICs as a distinct product with their own risks, and the risk is the price-versus-value gap.

    A colleague named Brent (yes, that Brent) bought a mid-sized LIC at a 15 percent premium to NTA in a bull year, because the portfolio had outperformed for three years. The premium closed over the next two years - not by the assets rising, but by the price falling toward the NTA. The portfolio's return was fine; his was negative. The highest-leverage thing most Australians can do is check the NTA against the price before buying any LIC, and treat a premium as a fee paid on day one.

    Real-world examples

    The discount arithmetic: $0.88 for $1.00 of assets

    The NTA is $1.00 and the market price is $0.88: a 12 percent discount. Each $10,000 invested buys $11,360 of audited assets, and the discount is the return the portfolio never has to earn. The same discount can widen to 20 percent in a panic, which turns the paper gain into a bigger paper loss first. Buying at a premium runs the whole arithmetic backwards, and the premium is invisible until it closes.

    The large LIC fee versus the 1.2 percent active fund

    A $100,000 holding in a large LIC at 0.15 percent costs $150 a year; the same money in a 1.2 percent active fund costs $1,200. Over 30 years at 7 percent gross, the fee gap compounds to roughly $210,000 - the same arithmetic the index-versus-active comparison produces. The large LIC and the index fund land in the same place from different directions: cheap, diversified and boring. The smaller LIC at 1 percent-plus does not land there.

    The closed structure through a drawdown

    In March 2020 the ASX fell by roughly a third in five weeks. An open-ended fund facing redemptions sells assets into the falling market; an LIC has a fixed share count, so the manager held the portfolio and the sellers traded shares with each other instead. The price fell with the market - the closed structure is not a downside hedge - but no assets were sold at the bottom. The structure removes forced selling, not volatility.

    Common mistakes

    Mistake: Confusing an LIC with an ETF.

    Why it bites you: An ETF price tracks its index and its units are created or redeemed on demand; an LIC price is whatever the market pays. The strategies differ and so does the discount risk.

    Mistake: Buying at a premium to NTA.

    Why it bites you: The premium is a fee paid on day one, and it usually closes by the price falling rather than the assets rising. Brent's 15 percent premium was a headwind for two years.

    Mistake: Assuming a discount means a bargain.

    Why it bites you: Discounts widen in panics and some persist for years because the portfolio deserves them - fee drag, stale holdings or a falling NTA. The discount is a price, not a signal.

    Mistake: Ignoring the fee difference across LICs.

    Why it bites you: The large ones charge roughly 0.1 to 0.2 percent; the smaller ones charge 1 percent-plus for strategies that struggle after fees. The name on the ticket is not the fee, and the annual report has the real number.

    Ivy's take

    I spent an afternoon comparing NTA tables across the large LICs and running the fee arithmetic through the compare investment fees calculator so you don't have to. The large LICs and the index fund converge on the same answer from different structures, and the difference between them is smaller than the difference between either and a 1.2 percent active fund. The NTA-versus-price line is the part of the annual report worth reading first.

    Brent bought the premium and called it quality. The premium closed by falling, not by the assets performing, and his return was negative while the portfolio's was fine. Buy at or below NTA, check the fee, and treat the closed structure as what it is: a way to hold a portfolio through a panic without forced selling. It is not a hedge; it is plumbing.

    Related jargon, defined

    NTA
    Net tangible assets - the audited per-share value of what the company owns.
    Closed-ended
    A fixed share count; no units are created or redeemed on demand.
    Premium
    A market price above the NTA - a headwind paid at purchase.
    Discount
    A market price below the NTA - extra assets per dollar, if it holds.
    LIC
    Listed investment company - a company whose business is a share portfolio.
    Franked dividend
    A dividend carrying credits for company tax already paid.

    Frequently asked questions

    What is the difference between an LIC and an ETF?+

    An ETF tracks an index and creates or redeems units on demand, so its price tracks the index closely. An LIC has a fixed share count and a market-set price, which can trade at a discount or premium to the portfolio's NTA.

    Why do LICs trade at a discount to NTA?+

    The market prices management, fees and sentiment on top of the assets, and the price falls when any of those deteriorate. Large, low-fee LICs historically trade near NTA; smaller or higher-fee ones trade at wider discounts.

    Are LICs good for dividends?+

    The large Australian LICs have paid dividends for decades and attach franking credits from their own company tax. The dividend depends on the portfolio's earnings, and a discount does not guarantee it.

    What fees do LICs charge?+

    The large ones charge management fees of roughly 0.1 to 0.2 percent a year, disclosed in the annual report. Smaller LICs charge 1 percent-plus, which compounds against the return the way any active fee does.

    Is an LIC safer than an ETF in a crash?+

    No. The price falls with the market either way - the closed structure removes forced selling, not volatility. The difference is that the manager holds the portfolio instead of selling assets into the fall.

    Disclaimer: This information is general in nature and does not constitute financial or legal advice. Always consult a qualified professional for your specific situation.

    Keep learning

    Ivy Sinclair-Wren

    Ivy Sinclair-Wren

    Financial Chaos Analyst

    Connect on LinkedIn

    Ivy Sinclair-Wren is a Financial Chaos Analyst covering investing, AI, wealth psychology, and the emotional consequences of opening finance apps during market crashes. Based in Melbourne, she specializes in demystifying the Australian tax code and helping users navigate the intersection of spreadsheet logic and human irrationality.